Can A Relation Be Both Symmetric And Antisymmetric Or Neither

7 min read Sep 21, 2024
Can A Relation Be Both Symmetric And Antisymmetric Or Neither

In the realm of mathematics, especially within the domain of set theory and discrete mathematics, the concepts of symmetry and antisymmetry play a pivotal role in defining the properties of relations. A relation is a set of ordered pairs, where the first element of each pair is related to the second element in some specific way. The notions of symmetry and antisymmetry help us understand the nature of these relationships and categorize them based on their inherent characteristics. This article delves into the intriguing question: can a relation be both symmetric and antisymmetric, or can it be neither? We will explore the definitions of these properties, illustrate them with examples, and demonstrate why a relation cannot be both symmetric and antisymmetric unless it is trivial.

Understanding Symmetry and Antisymmetry

Symmetry in a relation signifies that if an element a is related to another element b, then b is also related to a. Mathematically, this can be expressed as: if (a, b) ∈ R, then (b, a) ∈ R, where R denotes the relation. In simpler terms, a relation is symmetric if the order of the elements in the pair doesn't matter.

Antisymmetry, on the other hand, dictates that if an element a is related to an element b, and b is related to a, then a and b must be the same element. Formally, this is represented as: if (a, b) ∈ R and (b, a) ∈ R, then a = b. In essence, an antisymmetric relation implies that if two elements are related in both directions, they must be identical.

Can a Relation be Both Symmetric and Antisymmetric?

The answer to the question, "Can a relation be both symmetric and antisymmetric?" is a resounding "no, except for the trivial case where the relation only contains pairs of the form (a, a)." Let's examine why this is the case:

  • Symmetric Relation: If a relation is symmetric, the order of the elements doesn't matter. If (a, b) is in the relation, then (b, a) must also be in the relation.
  • Antisymmetric Relation: If a relation is antisymmetric, then if (a, b) and (b, a) are in the relation, a and b must be the same element.

If a relation is both symmetric and antisymmetric, and (a, b) is in the relation, then (b, a) must also be in the relation due to symmetry. But because the relation is also antisymmetric, this means that a and b must be the same element. Therefore, if a relation is both symmetric and antisymmetric, it can only contain pairs of the form (a, a), where the two elements are identical. This type of relation is often referred to as the identity relation.

Examples of Symmetric, Antisymmetric, and Neither

Let's illustrate the concepts of symmetry and antisymmetry with examples:

Example 1: Symmetric Relation

Consider the relation "is a sibling of" on a set of people. If person A is a sibling of person B, then person B is also a sibling of person A. This relation is symmetric because the order doesn't matter.

Example 2: Antisymmetric Relation

Consider the relation "is less than or equal to" on the set of real numbers. If number a is less than or equal to number b, and number b is less than or equal to number a, then a and b must be the same number. This relation is antisymmetric.

Example 3: Neither Symmetric Nor Antisymmetric

Consider the relation "is the father of" on a set of people. If person A is the father of person B, then person B is not the father of person A. This relation is neither symmetric nor antisymmetric.

Conclusion: The Nature of Relations

The interplay of symmetry and antisymmetry in relations highlights their fundamental nature and how they can be classified based on their properties. A relation cannot be both symmetric and antisymmetric except in the trivial case of the identity relation. Understanding these properties is crucial in various branches of mathematics, including set theory, graph theory, and order theory. They provide a framework for studying the relationships between elements in a set, leading to a deeper understanding of the underlying structures and patterns.