When Is A Fibration A Fiber Bundle?

10 min read Sep 25, 2024
When Is A Fibration A Fiber Bundle?

In the realm of topology, the concepts of fibrations and fiber bundles play crucial roles in understanding the structure of spaces and their relationships. While both involve a projection map onto a base space, they differ in their underlying properties, with fiber bundles imposing stricter conditions. This article delves into the question of when is a fibration a fiber bundle? It explores the key differences, provides examples, and examines the conditions under which a fibration satisfies the requirements to be classified as a fiber bundle.

Fibrations: A Fundamental Topological Structure

A fibration, in its simplest form, is a continuous map (p: E \to B) between topological spaces (E) (the total space) and (B) (the base space) that satisfies a specific lifting property. This property ensures that for any continuous map (f: X \to B) from a space (X) to the base space, and for any point (x_0 \in X) and any point (e_0 \in E) such that (p(e_0) = f(x_0)), there exists a continuous lift (\tilde{f}: X \to E) of (f) such that (\tilde{f}(x_0) = e_0) and (p \circ \tilde{f} = f). This means that for any path in the base space starting at a point (b), there exists a path in the total space starting at a point (e) above (b), such that the projection of the path in the total space coincides with the original path in the base space.

Fiber Bundles: A More Rigorous Structure

Fiber bundles, on the other hand, are more structured objects. They consist of a total space (E), a base space (B), a fiber (F), and a projection map (p: E \to B). Additionally, a fiber bundle requires that the total space be locally trivial, meaning that there exists an open cover of the base space such that each open set in the cover has a neighborhood in the total space that is homeomorphic to the product of the open set in the base space and the fiber. This local triviality condition implies that the total space can be "glued together" from pieces that are essentially copies of the fiber.

When is a Fibration a Fiber Bundle?

The key difference between fibrations and fiber bundles lies in the local triviality condition. While every fiber bundle is a fibration, the converse is not always true. A fibration may not possess the necessary local triviality to be classified as a fiber bundle.

Here are some important points to consider:

  • Local Triviality is Crucial: The key distinguishing factor between fibrations and fiber bundles lies in the local triviality condition. Fibrations are more general than fiber bundles, as they only require the lifting property. Fiber bundles, on the other hand, need both the lifting property and local triviality.

  • Examples: Consider the following examples:

    • The Hopf Fibration: This is a well-known example of a fibration that is not a fiber bundle. The Hopf fibration projects the 3-sphere (S^3) onto the 2-sphere (S^2), with each fiber being a circle. However, the total space (S^3) cannot be locally trivialized as a product of an open set in (S^2) and a circle.
    • The Tangent Bundle: This is a prime example of a fiber bundle. The tangent bundle of a smooth manifold (M) is a bundle whose total space consists of all tangent vectors to (M). The base space is (M), and the fiber is a vector space isomorphic to the tangent space at each point of (M). The local triviality condition holds because the tangent bundle can be locally trivialized as a product of an open set in (M) and the vector space.
  • The Importance of Local Triviality: The local triviality condition in fiber bundles has significant implications. It allows us to "cut" the total space into pieces that are isomorphic to the product of the base space and the fiber. This property is crucial for many applications, such as the construction of vector bundles, principal bundles, and other important geometric structures.

Conditions for a Fibration to be a Fiber Bundle

While not all fibrations are fiber bundles, some conditions can ensure that a given fibration satisfies the local triviality requirement. These conditions include:

  • The Base Space is a CW Complex: If the base space (B) is a CW complex, then any fibration (p: E \to B) with a connected fiber (F) is automatically a fiber bundle. This is because the lifting property of a fibration combined with the CW complex structure of the base space allows for local trivializations.

  • The Fiber is Locally Contractible: If the fiber (F) is locally contractible, meaning that every point in (F) has a neighborhood that is contractible within (F), then any fibration (p: E \to B) with a connected fiber (F) is a fiber bundle. This condition ensures that the lifting property can be used to construct local trivializations.

  • The Fiber is a Compact Lie Group: If the fiber (F) is a compact Lie group, then any fibration (p: E \to B) with a connected fiber (F) is a fiber bundle. This is due to the fact that compact Lie groups have nice properties that make it possible to define local trivializations.

Conclusion

In summary, while all fiber bundles are fibrations, the converse is not always true. The crucial difference lies in the local triviality condition, which dictates the ability to decompose the total space into products of the base space and the fiber. While not all fibrations satisfy this condition, certain conditions on the base space, the fiber, or the properties of the fibration itself can guarantee local triviality. Understanding the relationship between fibrations and fiber bundles is essential for navigating the intricacies of topological spaces and their associated structures. The concept of when is a fibration a fiber bundle underscores the subtle differences and the importance of local triviality in establishing the structure of fiber bundles.